From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-file to trash Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 20:38:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274488720 4478 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2010 00:38:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 00:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 22 02:38:39 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFcje-0004AN-AU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 02:38:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56093 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFcjd-0004Us-NN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 20:38:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35773 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFcjY-0004Ud-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 20:38:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFcjV-00042s-UK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 20:38:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:14407 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFcjV-00042o-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 20:38:29 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAL7E9ktFpZJF/2dsb2JhbACeGHK+ToUSBIw0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,281,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="64780996" Original-Received: from 69-165-146-69.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO alfajor.home) ([69.165.146.69]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 21 May 2010 20:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 75163AED71; Fri, 21 May 2010 20:38:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Fri, 21 May 2010 20:48:43 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125023 Archived-At: > I still maintain a more suitable approach is to have delete-file not > move to trash bin unless explicitly called for. For example, it can be > implemented similarly to handle-shift-selection. I agree. Instead of a `force' arg to opt-out, we should either use a new function for "move-to-trash" or use an opt-in arg like `move-to-trash'. Stefan