From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:52:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87lj0qstpw.fsf@speer.lan> <87lj0oyfar.fsf@speer.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299808333 5098 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2011 01:52:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 11 02:52:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxrWS-00031h-Td for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:52:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxrWS-0000u2-I9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:52:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38665 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxrWO-0000ts-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:52:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxrWM-0000pp-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:48949 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxrWM-0000pe-NH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:52:02 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAA4PeU3O+IG+/2dsb2JhbACmNHjBYoViBIUkkAk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,300,1297054800"; d="scan'208";a="95609754" Original-Received: from 206-248-129-190.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.129.190]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 10 Mar 2011 20:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A1EB266135; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:52:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andy Moreton's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:58:26 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137070 Archived-At: > I think that vc-hg-command does something similar - perhaps it > could be generalised to enhance vc-do-command ? Quite likely. The vc-.el files could benefit from merging some of the process handling with a replacement for vc-do-command which could (for example) automatically obey `vc--program'. Stefan