From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109187: Adjust consing_since_gc when objects are explicitly freed. Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:11:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <500D18D4.7010506@yandex.ru> <500D36C6.7000205@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343085082 23303 80.91.229.3 (23 Jul 2012 23:11:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 24 01:11:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1StRmb-0001iv-Pl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:11:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45125 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1StRma-00076a-Mr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:11:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1StRmU-000762-Kf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:11:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1StRmQ-0004g7-Ci for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:41006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1StRmQ-0004g3-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6NNB77F031635; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 97963AE323; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:11:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <500D36C6.7000205@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:34:30 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4288=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4288> : streams <789525> : uri <1173027> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151831 Archived-At: >>> IMHO, mostly because consing_since_gc means "total size of new >>> objects which are managed by GC". If we manage some of them by hand, >>> we shouldn't allow GC to overestimate an amount of work to be done. >> >> So, it's only for theoretical reasons? >> If so, I'd rather we don't bother. > Hm... not so theoretical. For example, this really helps, especially > when editing huge fontified buffers (not sure that this is 100% > correct, BTW): What helps? Adding those calls to free_marker, or adding the "decrement consing_since_gc in free_marker"? I can believe the first, but I doubt the second will make much of a difference. Stefan