From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r111061: Fix for bad test in ruby-mode-tests.el. Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:54:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878v9groov.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ehj7hiy7.fsf@gnu.org> <50BCF33B.4080809@yandex.ru> <85vccitddw.fsf@member.fsf.org> <50BE3903.8000507@gmx.at> <50BF16B7.8070608@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354719267 31439 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2012 14:54:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 14:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 05 15:54:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TgGMw-00086Z-IV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:54:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38674 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgGMk-0006lK-5t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:54:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgGMY-0006kx-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:54:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgGMP-0001W8-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:54:14 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:32935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgGMP-0001W4-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:54:05 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.DIT.UMontreal.CA (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qB5Es1Yb016285; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 10ABDB415D; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:54:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <50BF16B7.8070608@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:41:11 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4423=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4423> : streams <871691> : uri <1286008> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155294 Archived-At: >> AFAIK indent-sexp won't touch a line that's already properly indented, >> so TABs will only be changed to spaces (or vice versa) if you do >> fix the indentation, which is OK. > Right. But if you, say, introduce a new let binding somewhere at the > beginning of a defun and later on decide that you don't need it but do > want to keep other changes you made in between, reindenting will leave > whitespace changes in the new code. Better not worry about it. Stefan