From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:23:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383308643 31717 80.91.229.3 (1 Nov 2013 12:24:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V. Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 13:24:07 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VcDli-0002DD-DQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:24:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcDlh-0005Hf-Gi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcDlX-0005GL-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:23:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcDlO-00010R-5N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:23:51 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:1391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcDlO-00010N-15 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:23:42 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At8KABK/CFFMCrb4/2dsb2JhbABEvgsBAwEDexdzgh4BAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA6R6gV6DEw X-IPAS-Result: At8KABK/CFFMCrb4/2dsb2JhbABEvgsBAwEDexdzgh4BAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA6R6gV6DEw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="36842441" Original-Received: from 76-10-182-248.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.182.248]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Nov 2013 08:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DB72960637; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:23:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (T. V. Raman's message of "Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:10:36 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164798 Archived-At: > I just added (backtrace) at the top of the advice form. Check the docstring of `backtrace' ;-) It doesn't display the backtrace, it just prints it somewhere. Typically, you make it print into some temp buffer which you can consult manually later on. Stefan