From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:39:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <532B3FFE.5020403@gmx.at> <838us46lsr.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2hf5y2p.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395430804 32312 80.91.229.3 (21 Mar 2014 19:40:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, kanru@kanru.info, cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 21 20:40:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WR5IZ-0000Sw-4I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:40:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54443 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WR5IY-00057x-O6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:40:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WR5IM-00051p-PV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:40:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WR5IE-0004uN-JM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:39:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:49382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WR5I6-0004r8-3t; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:39:42 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F40384E14; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:39:41 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318F51E5B74; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:39:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0E54DB404C; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:39:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83d2hf5y2p.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:13:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 132.204.24.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170734 Archived-At: >> > If so, you have no other way but marking such frames "garbaged" when >> > they are deiconified. >> I highly doubt it. > How else can you redisplay a frame whose current glyph matrices fell > behind, while the frame was iconified? While the frame is iconified, glyph matrices are not updated, so if some part of the frame is modified during this time, its `redisplay' bit will be set (and stay set), so after it gets deiconified, redisplay will know that the glyph matrices need to be updated. Stefan