From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: find-gc.el Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 09:47:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399643297 28010 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2014 13:48:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 13:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 09 15:48:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wil9l-00017a-5u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 15:48:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52625 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wil9k-00026c-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 09:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wil9a-0001Oc-6M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 09:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wil9S-00081h-Dk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 09:47:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:60454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wil9S-00081c-9g; Fri, 09 May 2014 09:47:50 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNMCqwB/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgEqRmBaoNMIQ X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNMCqwB/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgEqRmBaoNMIQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="62026427" Original-Received: from 76-10-172-1.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.172.1]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 May 2014 09:47:48 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4175560203; Fri, 9 May 2014 09:47:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 08 May 2014 13:00:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171783 Archived-At: > Does find-gc.el do anything useful, or should it be obsoleted/deleted? Presumably it can be useful to check placement of the GCPROs. But I've never used it myself, and I'd rather move towards making sure all architectures can be built without GCPROs (and hence get rid of GCPROs, eventually). In any case I think it belongs in admin rather than in lisp/emacs-lisp. Stefan