From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA updating properly? Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:14:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87io2lakhg.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453529739 3523 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2016 06:15:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 06:15:39 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 23 07:15:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aMrTp-00019F-OH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 07:15:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56366 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMrTo-00088L-Np for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:15:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53199) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMrTa-00085w-3V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMrTW-0005hE-Tb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMrTW-0005gq-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aMrTU-0000zt-V1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 07:15:05 +0100 Original-Received: from 108.161.125.56 ([108.161.125.56]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 07:15:04 +0100 Original-Received: from monnier by 108.161.125.56 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 07:15:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.161.125.56 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Spx9AgRGaoKG3cUxBN1dEUpgt+0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198616 Archived-At: > (It sounds like the archive update process is too sensitive to problems > with individual packages? If I'm understanding correctly, then it should > report problems with a package, and move on to the next, rather than > disrupting the entire process. Agreed. I plead guilty! > From only having glanced at the code, that may require refactoring, > and of course it takes someone who has time to do that...) Thank you for stepping forward. ;-) Stefan