From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: accumulated timers which machine is in suspend-to-ram Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:26:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874l6rc8wf.fsf@web.de> <83h8aq8ruq.fsf@gnu.org> <871s1t29ku.fsf@web.de> <83k1fl6gtb.fsf@gnu.org> <874l6o5u95.fsf@web.de> <83r29r3nb5.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef5r35l5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="41928"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 24 15:29:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hJHxN-000Agb-Qd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:29:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41789 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJHxM-0002HQ-Lo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:29:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJHvZ-0001d5-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJHvS-0002en-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:35379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJHvO-0002Lv-Ij; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:27:00 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x3ODQsEn010434; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:26:55 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3CA7A66184; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:26:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83ef5r35l5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:17:42 +0300") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6532=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6532> : inlines <7059> : streams <1819592> : uri <2836507> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235857 Archived-At: > So how is what you are seeing different from the "normal" repetition? It can take almost a minute for Emacs to become responsive after waking up. That's much more than running savehist-save 10 times, AFAICT. Stefan