From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 11:48:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83pnohbhny.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhn6zkgf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="15737"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Noam Postavsky , Emacs developers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 29 17:56:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hW0vs-0003t5-0C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 17:56:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57009 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW0vr-000260-1z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW0pE-0005yZ-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:49:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW0pD-0006Rc-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:15381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW0p7-0006Nj-Oe; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4F0BC810B1; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:49:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2327780451; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:49:02 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1559144942; bh=Ymw+mSoRpPQWF94X3ajzNfA757IBUbpNqSMaHOAv/b0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=MtwwnAqLCFbE2g98MmKagQEuaVbLez/RHB8i8uVo1zsUoorvjvje5X3RNrQJoKH1k HeBwlLjYe6/wO4ydpV1+72SlKguk+ff5z5xBWMw7CNrCQKtfyJR3fVzrpFf2B+FySE KRIAF5zpwkvmRkWp/kCkM908a2Tly95N5rZ8lFYaLirrzXRaEJaHIdq3BhD0r4QQGx Ug8CL6hIRNeheXNibShQJgTXJQegsjFEDIyyK8TLtal4U/aol8zH8nwrc//Ojcj2h0 F4SrYMqXE8btw0Te99HQ99flF3MPE8IFwMoWSJVTsFbMf3Q4bMohZj9ieRQML8F+qu FDjUaePIlbwaQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (modemcable157.163-203-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.203.163.157]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 058CB120C68; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:49:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 29 May 2019 13:17:30 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237156 Archived-At: > Let's see... Oh, right. `with-no-warnings' is a function, while I > thought it would make sense for `with-suppressed-warnings' to be a macro > since the WARNINGS are supposed to be unevaluated. Yes, a macro makes sense. > But as a macro that expands to (basically) `progn', then the byte > compiler just sees the `progn' and is unable to do anything with the > form. You can use byte-compile-macro-environment to override the default definition of the macro during compilation. Stefan