From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:22:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20201013190255.GA8896@ACM> <838sca0w7k.fsf@gnu.org> <20201013195103.GB8896@ACM> <87sgahvohq.fsf@igel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3129"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Gregory Heytings , Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , "Gregory Heytings via Emacs development discussions." To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 14 00:25:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSSjG-0000hw-J5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:25:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39316 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSSjF-0002fO-HC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSShL-0001Yb-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:26094) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSShI-00077h-Mp; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 722B8100518; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:23:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9941A1002BA; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:23:00 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1602627780; bh=yvu3wo4VcIbGvcQdwwcnv3lACOKvz1mMgl66GQAW/mQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NMoF+zECTKdMDsbfjtLjxSWPzAjLKYKGvBqj/SdpuZl0Fa/9c9Gz/m4qc8DUu9FZr LMlwtoQ22xFHiBVhVK+9TW6aIYCXdgvosPPe6fEXqzJaaXjQzFh+51xJnqNaQBIY5e Qqq+wSp7/BEuIyuMTAr1Hu8vQzZxnBr7sXr1fIW/e8o+BnpOMlgE5jNtS/vOK8BOjc d8+eLa3BtIbPbgyVbeO8llgPqGkfTeyoMKhurEk2ZCNJdIcvq9iwH93Y8QzM0e1f4r B5yfGvyNjfGXt3KO8/XgF+J9Yx76FgwPswaERncorT5y8XjuIIYbsZAVPYuyy82PqL X3c4UL0LZqz+w== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.9.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14EEC1202E7; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:23:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87sgahvohq.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:51:13 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/13 18:23:06 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257596 Archived-At: >> I agree with you on one thing: C-x 8 RET should raise a "Command attempted >> to use minibuffer while in minibuffer" error in this case (when >> enable-recursive-minibuffers is nil, which is its default value). I'm not >> sure why it doesn't. > Because read-char-by-name binds enable-recursive-minibuffers to t. Which it does to allow you to use `C-x 8 RET` to insert unicode chars into minibuffers. Stefan