From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merging native-comp and pgtk Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:06:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <07D5E64D-DAD0-45B3-B272-627A73D7CBAE@gmail.com> <87pn1erewq.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnvlecrw.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg69o3av.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwhctte.fsf@gnus.org> <459A0475-E3E7-4159-82DF-93809CCF1E24@gmail.com> <87eehng52n.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwbye5b.fsf@gmail.com> <87czx7ycva.fsf@tcd.ie> <87eehmyalr.fsf@gmail.com> <877dneoewi.fsf@tcd.ie> <875z2yy6z7.fsf@gmail.com> <878s7twq2t.fsf@gmail.com> <84adc238-c424-bb6b-da28-c4232172da5b@gmx.at> <83wnvddtgh.fsf@gnu.org> <86k0rc2a44.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12692"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 13 00:10:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAhZr-0003DQ-30 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:10:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56462 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAhZp-0007NW-Tp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:10:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAhWX-0005TI-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:06:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:28914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAhWT-0007zE-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:06:52 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 66ABD44109B; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:06:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F22EB441080; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:06:45 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1613171205; bh=ZuSuxMZfistbnQX1ZtU1ZwXD00gpid2F8tKQ7yE27e8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mhYI7L4IBtiIOuetEyKLfam3q42TyrwpBrb5VWPAh2G6lgpzZROHDZFIF/T40Mpcj j0AjZQCCLcjm8xRW5fMP5TVcX3llEizOTpW18OCK6GQdnK4o2MM8jCUk81ThXRR0eD OJntBjauCs6YeyDnD7BPtVOIF3c+XHNsg03ZcDfgbGyy5cglVxKUtPtp0mPhGq+1pU YgB2Fr96X53q6ryJVSII34nDKitTC11nqXjuHHo7khq+t0hq0OU3ABb5FYt9UxWWFP Rkk5NFoXcHrJ/OAuu7Nt37ixB0nyrmHXCgjrZ3txEUvfzurY2tQO2A0MLFx62uf/ps WRZeyCGrWUfhg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8C26120218; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:06:45 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86k0rc2a44.fsf@gmail.com> (Andy Moreton's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2021 22:29:31 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264566 Archived-At: > For me, the native-comp branch is not yet usable on mingw64 64bit: Should "usable on mingw64" a prerequisite to merge a branch for an experimental feature that will only be activated upon explicit user request? > The native-comp branch looks promising, but still needs a little more > work to make it suitable for wider use. Whether that should be done on a > development branch or after merging into master is a separate issue. But this thread is specifically about where that work should take place. As long as the code is on a separate branch, it incurs the extra overhead of having to keep merging changes from `master` to keep it up to date. Stefan