From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:59:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83mtjwzwkb.fsf@gnu.org> <87r198ytog.fsf@gnus.org> <878rvfzs8p.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3358"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 16 16:01:24 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9723-0000iJ-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 16:01:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9722-0006iK-7a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 10:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n970B-0005sg-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:59:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:1685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9702-0003Z3-KY; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:59:27 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0D662440B42; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:59:14 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CC243440BDC; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:59:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1642345152; bh=hQnOpyniLH+VO4vMX4pGLiQnc8hcE85pel0TBPxrB8E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=aBmbSypNbGztxuxltUGiMUDzpPjlQhqlk3UmHk2iCMR1InW/YCB5zpVFgerFf4EbL Ze71FjjOTgXWkK8mQiq97w+56ooXoZIuGETjpi1iitsUZfTXl7C3m0qMgqX2I5VAam 1k9y9j64GFkaQbKGEZxKpcUHXDVHTegoR7C8ynM4QTdNHvgJ0EV5/rpiw1JOnLkVxe JnqiLT8QzAFigp4zWK58pJ/TjfJQ5JSp9y40JcRN4ayr3AqvjUDVl47F3lOA15K4KC WmJ3mQ905h5Phv1sVdHJpd6gT15EBFz7kyBzq70G7A4tDvge2aY6rl6X3+YrO1Gcpq kzSy14W4PxghA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91BD8120206; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:59:12 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <878rvfzs8p.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 16 Jan 2022 15:10:14 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284825 Archived-At: > This was a build without nativecomp, which doesn't compile comp.el, I > think? But that seems like a separate issue -- I'm not all that worried > about the Emacs build time, but compilation is usually a nice benchmark, > because it exercises a lot of the Emacs machinery. But you'd need to run the old compiler with the new code (or vice versa) in order to compare apples with apples :-( Stefan