From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Re: Early backtrace. Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:04:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31766"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 31 15:22:32 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nEXZg-0007yU-2q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:22:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55870 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEXZe-0005cU-KE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:22:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEXIe-0001n3-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:04:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:35863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEXIb-0007GF-6w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:04:55 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1AF938005D; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:04:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BDCA88070D; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:04:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1643637886; bh=ZcbY1Sybo9EtdMC/ruzRxyQKvJ3ve9nAT0y6eC3Gnpw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DU5uF6AY6/F91bc7fMCFyIoH0ZBo/Asdfswr2tE7YZ0kTIAYX4urAO9rZlEYr223t hLXEcsHeZ9Wnujfg0/KlsZooiRfx33H/R8C96zQXGs7mqGuMWuff0IvaLfkambXM/W v7R458tqkzGKERkZv+7JozsbdrDi2Z02IEsUkrpgYGKyLHuBENnUQ+0MAjt0HCT2sp y0u8GIvQ0+aKsQcc76vIBSOsdWi7/GpLLJ4b49JZF2Ymb9NTYXtI8oAPc7DgdUrlQd dRNf6YM2Yi27SZU7PDJDM1tcd0Ng5FWhx5o2O7REFse3igAaJMq8EDgYGRrVauKwd+ 8PzzTG16sC9+A== Original-Received: from pastel (76-10-138-212.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.138.212]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FFA612089F; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:04:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 30 Jan 2022 11:31:30 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285670 Archived-At: >> /* If we're in batch mode, print a backtrace unconditionally to help >> - with debugging. Make sure to use `debug' unconditionally to not >> - interfere with ERT or other packages that install custom >> - debuggers. Don't try to call the debugger while dumping or >> - bootstrapping, it wouldn't work anyway. */ >> + with debugging. Make sure to use `debug-early' unconditionally >> + to not interfere with ERT or other packages that install custom >> + debuggers. */ > > This is not your fault, but I notice that this comment doesn't explain > how we distinguish the case where we want to print a backtrace from the > case where we want to call ERT's "debugger", both of which can occur in > batch mode. Eli helped me figure out that I was confused here. So just disregard this comment of mine. Sorry, Stefan