From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Cannot isearch for non-ascii chars with emacs -nw -Q Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87oda4d6h8.fsf@fastmail.fm> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204081864 18240 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2008 03:11:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 04:11:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUChR-000598-C9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:11:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUCgv-0001mc-82 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUCgr-0001mH-3z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUCgl-0001kn-C2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUCgl-0001kZ-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUCgl-00080D-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JUCgk-00017x-IM for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUCgh-0007zL-Jn for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:34 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUCgh-0007zH-CJ for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:31 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAFZjxEdMCpz5Wmdsb2JhbACQXgEgnS1/ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,411,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="15102121" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2008 22:10:26 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([76.10.156.249]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id HFL97226; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:26 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 96F837FA7; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:10:26 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87oda4d6h8.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:19:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90564 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21303 Archived-At: > C-s =C3 =B6 =C3 =B6 =C3 =B6 C-g C-g C-g C-g ESC x r e p o TAB r Hmm... "=C3 =B6" in latin-1 is "0xC3 0xB6" which is the utf-8 codes for =F6, so the C-h l output indicates your terminal sends utf-8 sequences and Emacs gets them fine, but if you say that instead of =F6 you saw some =B6, it may indicate that your keyboard-coding-system somehow is set to use latin-1 coding system rather than utf-8, or maybe the binary codes get treated as latin-1 by the unicode-charset. Stefan