From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: translation-table-for-input Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:46:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233595137 26610 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2009 17:18:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 02 18:20:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LU2Sj-00063q-MK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:19:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LU2RQ-0003QG-WB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:18:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LU2IL-0003V3-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LU2IJ-0003Sa-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43042 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LU2IJ-0003SS-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:09:11 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:5733) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LU2IG-0000aU-4Q; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:09:08 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AswEAD+3hknO+IQk/2dsb2JhbACBbsozhBQGgmw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,366,1231131600"; d="scan'208";a="33208402" Original-Received: from 206-248-132-36.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.132.36]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2009 12:09:07 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0CFFCB4119; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:46:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:30:49 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108596 Archived-At: > These `obsolete' warnings are a general problem: we have no way to say > "yes, I know this variable is obsolete, but this is the implementation > rather than a use of the feature". The closest we have is > with-no-warnings, which is a rather blunt tool. > It is not blunt if you use it around a small piece of code > with a comment to explain why. It still silences any other warning that might occur (e.g. in the future) in that same small piece of code. So it's still blunt. Stefan