From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr check Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:39:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263484566 26954 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 15:56:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 16:55:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVS2l-0002rD-Fr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:55:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46494 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVS2m-0000SM-Ae for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:55:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRnK-00060F-Lq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:39:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRnF-0005tV-NP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:39:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45962 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRnE-0005t2-Of for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:39:28 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:50212 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVRnB-00039W-UQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:39:27 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq8EACfJTktFxLLV/2dsb2JhbACBRddJhDAEijY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,275,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="53741599" Original-Received: from 69-196-178-213.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.178.213]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2010 10:39:25 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4299D70033; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:39:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:15:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120002 Archived-At: > Contrarily to some opinions voiced here, I'm quite happy with both the > feature set and the performance of Bazaar (though any improvement will > be welcome, as will bzr+shh). > However, there's one operation that I just cannot do on Windows: "bzr > check" of the repository. At the rate it works, I estimate more than > 24 hours to check it. It's that a consequence of the Emacs repository > size, or Bazaar performance on NTFS, or just something in my setup? I've never used it (in more than a year of use, maybe two), and since I don't think I'm an oddball user of Bazaar, I wouldn't fault the developpers if they spent 0 time on speeding up "bzr check". Stefan