From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: more url-utils? Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 22:26:59 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87fwogaxzb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mxilezg8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boz0eov8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxikrulm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871uzw5asv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boyzcv0o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4dnassv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878vu23lpe.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306811505 15735 80.91.229.12 (31 May 2011 03:11:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 03:11:45 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 05:11:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRFMr-0002Cz-Bi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 05:11:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35155 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRFMq-0000OL-Eu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:11:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54840) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRFMn-0000OE-ML for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:11:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRFMm-0000Vo-RU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:11:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:45817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRFMm-0000Vj-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:11:36 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:55030 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRFMm-000382-Fu; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:11:36 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 25D6A66212; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:26:59 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 31 May 2011 01:11:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139925 Archived-At: >> The sync case can set-buffer as well, so both choices are possible >> without breaking consistency. I don't have a strong preference >> either way. > So calling (url-fetch "http://google.com") would change the current > buffer? I think that sounds like very surprising behaviour... Oh, wait, no, because I wanted url-fetch to insert the result in the current-buffer, rather than creating a brand new buffer. Stefan