From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: draft for DEL key poll Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:53:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87litcvtu2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87d3endlw3.fsf@kwarm.red-bean.com> <877h4vync0.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87y5x8xp06.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317264842 28245 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2011 02:54:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 29 04:53:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R96l3-0002IL-G6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:53:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42846 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R96l3-0007XI-1C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:53:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R96kz-0007W8-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:53:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R96ky-00076o-Nb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:53:53 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:50525 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R96ky-00075n-Kv; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:53:52 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAPncg05FpZLc/2dsb2JhbABCqAZ5gVMBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDYgvuB2HDASgaIRD X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,458,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="139065272" Original-Received: from 69-165-146-220.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.146.220]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 28 Sep 2011 22:53:49 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C84B1660B6; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:53:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y5x8xp06.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> (Kim F. Storm's message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:48:09 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144463 Archived-At: > I didn't suggest that - but since users of cua-mode are already > accustomed to the proposed new behaviour, maybe you could note that > cua-mode users should ignore the poll, as they are not affected by the > change. We could mention that this change makes standard a subset of the behavior provided by delete-selection-mode, pc-selection-mode, and cua-mode, indeed. Stefan