From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lexical byte-compilation warnings cleanup Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:12:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87fvu3pqn8.fsf@dpaduchikh.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377115954 7636 80.91.229.3 (21 Aug 2013 20:12:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Dmitri Paduchikh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 21 22:12:35 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VCEle-0003no-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:12:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56576 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCEld-0007dl-Ua for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:12:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCElT-0007cp-TI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:12:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCElL-0000m1-CL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:12:23 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:34133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCElL-0000lv-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:12:15 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+LNT/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+LNT/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="22829682" Original-Received: from 206-248-179-83.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.179.83]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Aug 2013 16:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3E9C366DC1; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:12:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87fvu3pqn8.fsf@dpaduchikh.invalid> (Dmitri Paduchikh's message of "Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:19:23 +0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162958 Archived-At: > The warning seems to say opposite: Yup. The way I thought about it when I wrote it is that `load-path' is a dynamically-scoped var, not a lexical var. But indeed, here it will (locally) be a lexical var, so the wording is rather poor. Suggestions for better wording? Stefan