From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:42:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <83siqc7n87.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9ck6lzf.fsf@gnu.org> <83eh1v5y53.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5024r1w.fsf@gnu.org> <83ior6489a.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395502946 10142 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2014 15:42:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, cloos@jhcloos.com, kanru@kanru.info, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 22 16:42:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO48-0005nP-Ps for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:42:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57360 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO48-0000xd-ER for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:42:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO3z-0000xW-GI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO3s-0006Ec-79 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:42:23 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:25760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRO3k-0006Dk-Ar; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:42:08 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHAqyMT/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgbBLY0GhAQDjhiYQIMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHAqyMT/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgbBLY0GhAQDjhiYQIMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="52968149" Original-Received: from 192-171-35-19.cpe.pppoe.ca (HELO pastel.home) ([192.171.35.19]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 Mar 2014 11:42:07 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 423AF600C6; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:42:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83ior6489a.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:29:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170804 Archived-At: >> > This is for visible frames, while we were discussing frames that are >> > iconified. >> AFAIK iconified frames don't get expose events. > Do frames get them when they are deiconified? If and when needed, they should, yes. E.g. not if they're deiconified but obscured by some other window. And not if they're deiconified and redrawn directly by the window-system based on a backup of the previous window's content. Otherwise, yes. Stefan