From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we use `symbol' or 'symbol' in Emacs change logs? Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 16:26:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871tvczf1l.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvjsgzo0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401395251 13678 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2014 20:27:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 20:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Achim Gratz , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 29 22:27:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wq6v5-0008FH-Cq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 22:27:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50144 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wq6v4-0006EL-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 16:27:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wq6uu-0006Cf-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 16:27:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wq6ul-00033h-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 16:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:40365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wq6uk-00033V-Uk; Thu, 29 May 2014 16:27:03 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVPO+IOj/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIImAQEEViMQCw4mEhQYDSSIDNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVPO+IOj/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIImAQEEViMQCw4mEhQYDSSIDNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="65000630" Original-Received: from 206-248-131-163.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.131.163]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 29 May 2014 16:26:59 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3FE71601BC; Thu, 29 May 2014 16:26:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 29 May 2014 15:52:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172185 Archived-At: > (Personally I think "every existing ChangeLog in Emacs" was > documentation enough.) Agreed. And if someone happens to use 'foo' in a ChangeLog entry, the world won't fall apart (at least, not immediately). Stefan