From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:11:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y4t9m76w.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83lhopb1bp.fsf@gnu.org> <83oatjapq2.fsf@gnu.org> <838uknae9a.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413310326 11669 80.91.229.3 (14 Oct 2014 18:12:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs development discussions To: =?windows-1252?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Aptel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 14 20:11:59 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe6Zi-0004JB-Eg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:11:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe6Zh-0008D9-TX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe6ZX-0008Cq-Gf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe6ZQ-0005TV-1w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:11:47 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:43702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe6ZP-0005TR-UF; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:11:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s9EIBach030798; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:11:36 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7022566089; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:11:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Aur=E9lien?= Aptel"'s message of "Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:46:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5094=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <5094> : inlines <1396> : streams <1316756> : uri <1824891> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175361 Archived-At: > - should we provide a destructor mechanism in the GC? You mean "finalizers"? Sounds fine, yes. The GC code already has code that does similar things to handle various kinds of "weak" pointers. > - should we add a new generic lisp type for opaque pointers? Fine by me, yes. > - how should modules be packaged? As GNU ELPA packages, of course. Stefan