From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 0a5b6e2: Fix aborts in GC under GC_CHECK_MARKED_OBJECTS Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20161221201813.3130.28327@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20161221201813.A13CA2201BA@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482352173 8188 195.159.176.226 (21 Dec 2016 20:29:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:29:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 21 21:29:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJnVs-0001F8-BL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:29:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJnVw-0007wG-Jo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJnVn-0007vV-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJnVk-0006Ng-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:19 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:45590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJnVk-0006MT-3o; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id uBLKTCGx029143; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:13 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A51D166293; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:12 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20161221201813.A13CA2201BA@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:18:13 +0000 (UTC)") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV5895=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5895> : inlines <5596> : streams <1725656> : uri <2344664> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210715 Archived-At: > for thread objects. They are marked via the all_threads list, and > therefore don't need to be inserted into the red-black tree, so > mem_find will never find them. Hmm... when are they removed from all_threads? If they're removed from all_threads when the thread terminates, then there can still be references to the thread object stored elsewhere in the heap. Stefan