From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: docstrings and elisp reference Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:27:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <0BB64F35-233A-471F-B99F-51F96C4E6CCB@gmail.com> <8360g99n07.fsf@gnu.org> <86lgp4q2xa.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <7acc7d4f-23cc-4b6a-b062-ef92805e465b@default> <878tl3rz38.fsf@x230.lts> <877f0ln3dx.fsf@x230.lts> <83fuf870zf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497238073 22489 195.159.176.226 (12 Jun 2017 03:27:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 03:27:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 12 05:27:49 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKG17-0005as-4B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 05:27:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35940 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKG1C-0004VN-Gf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:27:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKG16-0004V7-Hs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:27:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKG13-0007Kh-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:27:48 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:5038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKG13-0007KB-2q; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:27:45 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DORQDMCD5Z/zz6SC1dHQEFAQsBg1iKb4V/kHsrAZVYghCGHgQCAoMASQ8BAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kijcIsgGLZAEBAQcCJothij4fAQSQNY4KlTcBiRWHApRsSQENgQowIQgwh3IkilIBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0DORQDMCD5Z/zz6SC1dHQEFAQsBg1iKb4V/kHsrAZVYghCGHgQCAoMASQ8BAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kijcIsgGLZAEBAQcCJothij4fAQSQNY4KlTcBiRWHApRsSQENgQowIQgwh3IkilIBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,332,1493697600"; d="scan'208";a="315303941" Original-Received: from 45-72-250-60.cpe.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([45.72.250.60]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Jun 2017 23:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AC879662C5; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:27:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 11 Jun 2017 22:52:32 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215587 Archived-At: > The current discussion is about documenting reliably whether each > variable is a hook or not. The old name is probably obsolete, but a > user might enter it in C-h v. How will we say whether it is > a hook? C-h v will say that it's obsolete and point to the new name which indicates clearly it's a hook. Stefan