From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build: other output
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:09:08 -0400
Message-ID: <jwvh88nnfyu.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
References: <m3r28xrfl9.fsf@gnus.org> <jwvimtttg8t.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m3ftoi3m5o.fsf@gnus.org> <m3blz63j41.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV-85nAR_vHoXhmZfuu1ndfK-6FVopzKMbwtfDmm7gkU7Kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <m336ki3ghd.fsf@gnus.org> <jwvimteipi7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m3v9xezi75.fsf@gnus.org> <m3r282zfjx.fsf@gnus.org>
 <83a7eo9nsh.fsf@gnu.org> <m3k1dqzyul.fsf@gnus.org>
 <m336kezrno.fsf@gnus.org> <jwvzhmmsca1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m35zp4e7n2.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <m31rzse3uj.fsf@gnus.org>
 <m3r27scnou.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <jwvlfxzu9ci.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m3muif9py3.fsf@gnus.org> <jwv8stzrt7b.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m3zhmf6mk5.fsf@gnus.org> <m3v9x36lj8.fsf@gnus.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="268502"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 16:10:34 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hdEoh-0017e8-Nh
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:10:31 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58384 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hdEog-0001ku-Nw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:10:30 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59627)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1hdEoJ-0001g6-Ez
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:10:08 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1hdEoI-00069t-JU
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:10:07 -0400
Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=59432 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>)
 id 1hdEoI-00068N-C5
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:10:06 -0400
Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1hdEoD-00175L-TR
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:10:01 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4FcPU0rUP0R1+ptEi+PwGcU4jI0=
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237845
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/237845>

> So somebody has struggled with this before, apparently.  :-/  But since
> that variable is not a per-grammar setting, it doesn't seem very
> useful..

So you can mark this variable as obsolete after you add your own take
on this.


        Stefan