From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PL support Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 23:48:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <83pnbegsvm.fsf@gnu.org> <83imh5hby1.fsf@gnu.org> <2e4e8ce9-d857-f3e3-31cf-a40dee67bd25@yandex.ru> <83y2q1dsvh.fsf@gnu.org> <2468efa6-7dbd-8634-44cc-586bb6985f49@yandex.ru> <83pnbddrfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k11ldpxs.fsf@gnu.org> <83imh5dnun.fsf@gnu.org> <2c09354e7994f0e61271ab0078256a9dc4202171.camel@k-7.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="84675"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: casouri@gmail.com, seb@k-7.ch, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 12 05:50:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYLvo-000LwQ-Ve for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 05:50:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54378 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYLvn-0006H9-QM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:50:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59866) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYLuY-0004Dl-PJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:38631) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYLuX-0008Rd-Vq; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DC12E81360; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:48:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 36ACC8118C; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:48:51 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1589255331; bh=bX29KW011PF0/2pq/6JfzDNa2fFIU0DTt7yn2WFfV6A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=pJU1AeaB0B1CHNUjGmn4+o/cvpEXIs85XLI2kTDkqW/xnAfEcjRLSEhBULwlwLgBU cz7tz9+lD8iA7etTUsE/8/DFKRCKTzHsZgY77hibM/w9DPLFAmw+riuqERqwNQlBmm naU/4g7mG0jEZpE8Q72VTQbEMCNOWcrbqx0wsylfmK6dc7wxSE9/khuCLGGaLNoFjU eoZWlhG/hQWE95c5lVBgnEQLQALHY5YCb0HxVy5keo0+ObzCc3bHDzbNAVZSpRXHza Nsr7nCFMVpZ4ohtcOa7F6Ed4hsb9A/tKw3IhWc5BxSjZxhg3FjeC6pEINqf8iRSc3M g0iH5eXFxhWvg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.3.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7773120D41; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:48:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 11 May 2020 23:21:24 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/11 23:10:21 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249935 Archived-At: > > As a matter of fact, we *already* do that, typically in the form of > > instructions in `Commentary:`, `INSTALL`, manuals, messages in > > mailing-lists, etc... > Those are suggestions, not automatic, I don't know what you mean by "automatic". Would displaying those same instructions qualify as "automatic"? Stefan