From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "whether the global keymap C-x 4 will be replaced by a command," Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:55:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83ft9woo68.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo377wxp.fsf_-_@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25636"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 14 07:56:20 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jvDvQ-0006XW-9t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 07:56:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42330 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jvDvP-0006Gd-Bz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:56:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jvDuU-0005KZ-6F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:49577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jvDuM-00053R-LP; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 22A8980ACA; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:55:13 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AD7258022C; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:55:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1594706111; bh=Tf5vk83zsdq9yewQsFD2P3qKCkjc7ue2JQvRZdKlu3Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z7b906abQdrSyjxFdPBRmsNvlfign/98OW8iJ4TeJTXIVNGknB5l3D4kyAc20H1JB C4BvC7Lb3DLeLK9Lo6pwncDz37p0VVNsNtLwD/X2ShB9N8qtbn9SM2qFdZ5Skoq4VK 8yLoHi0VLrjEmQiMNMi68OklCpR6INxB+7XH+XmsyD2Pu5vTeAgR/pEuMyBPUvVCG+ 4vCKEaNlbSwq1ee1M3OdvM6WqGo1LQI2I2Wkzm1J1i5NErWWlAi2WkIqCny0vTTMCu el6PyOZWxbYWz7V7n+x02uXdWsHufqWhdMrSWnC1Bm4LRqpUqXwZVEmGyPlQ7OeyIr JraooNCuulbPw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.129.42]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71CC21204BB; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:55:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87wo377wxp.fsf_-_@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Tue, 14 Jul 2020 02:58:20 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/14 01:49:37 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252943 Archived-At: > This means that after binding the current ctl-x-4-map in Emacs core > to the other-window command, 'C-h k C-x 4' will display the help for > that command, not for the whole sequence 'C-h k C-x 4 C-f'. I don't think we can/should make `C-h k` read all of `C-x 4 C-f`, indeed. But maybe we could make the following work: `C-x 4 C-h k C-f`. Stefan