From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 496bed5: Change command-completion-using-modes-p to defun Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:17:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20210220144350.4736.64583@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210220144351.6424B20B7C@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <878s7hmw4b.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16980"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 21 21:19:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDvCW-0004KG-FR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 21:19:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56082 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDvCV-0002Ch-FP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDvAp-0000qD-G7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:17:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:35899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDvAn-0005U9-U5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:17:47 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B3C844402EF; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:17:44 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7CF11440422; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:17:43 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1613938663; bh=XqAESFXSBDiGWh50k9Xmpw88acbUsodYVzLll/NtSKg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=HCrMVw/Tvecn0BRVZ1w3P4m8Wj92cJ5KzjbjwP2Nz3Wu3RDjR8+/A6Lj7rFt4XaEq bFa3XJXLo6aSYXe/NLYcnWoB3IVcDcSSGnKN2+Yi54l0fvVfzvtksYt8l0R/f+cHsp U4rhWCymJQ5qyJN1KxjXvrjdFUCT18iiSjNwAtdaKu06M4WCovKzIWKDb1qr0RzkgO 0RVfwtOEBT1r66MpbZEfyTfjuaRNqAHJq/YuZazh09+9uEcUorXxe4z3mClFTMH6Di 6AOTfcIYPvFzphG6iFFAj+omgwYgDNWAM2eYQX/XJYSA/VYNdluis4kaXHlTkmnzra D3iOqe/x7UDyg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8779120202; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:17:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <878s7hmw4b.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:41:08 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265439 Archived-At: > By the way, changing it back to a defun doesn't seem to clear out the > define-inline-ness? In the current session, indeed. That's a general problem with the use of `put`: the info is associated with the symbol rather than with the actual definition. Same holds for `gv-expand`, or obsoletion, and many others. But not for `advertized-calling-convention` because this one uses a hash-table indexed with the actual function object ;-) Stefan