From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:39:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eac8da31543@heytings.org> <30f0a4188e796ef64509@heytings.org> <496380cc60478547e162@heytings.org> <496380cc6050c3dcb765@heytings.org> <496380cc60c39dd43419@heytings.org> <496380cc6019a973ad08@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14745"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 17:49:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkyc-0003jc-Hk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:49:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44804 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkyb-00055o-HY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:49:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkpV-00059g-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:40:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:8170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkpS-0003M4-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:40:00 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2F56B440871; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:39:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 01D66440C36; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:39:56 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1615567196; bh=5Jjbml4QdggrNs/lWyi2ls2R11pjKA6PIkcYSflln50=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GHAVNe8B67/ieyNCzJ5BIynGmxEU+6Bw5J2FPy5lKgbr+ObZFqNbBKU2jWR00DxFv +UaWClYohNDLgoSjCehKoXQkxm921lKbsj6OKOsfBDPCr1LNAa3KdMRoXUbAyjNWtQ zCj3dF9hc/ooOeVcyylpUSZ+oNLkGVjZfPZzhLm7vj5l2ZZl5azFAfxydwToWzf4ut PmDBGJW6J2ytoiucd93EQ6semAfQVYjtf3lJXu5PYsFgKPVwae/T34aysJiYrMWXf5 gLovwWZJi5Jyw2MRKp9MoBvrlI/ANbtUowQY6Gqq4m3aVsNfitxJV8soovGefad90r piPo3Zb5UhsgQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.43.249]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE60412034D; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:39:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <496380cc6019a973ad08@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:09:13 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266408 Archived-At: > Indeed, what I proposed would be similar to what exists. But I still don't > understand: what is the bug when font-lock-mode is disabled in an elisp-mode > buffer? It gives you some part of the code fontified and the rest not, and if you edit that part that is fontified the fontification will just "stick" where it is, regardless if it's still valid/relevant. I can't think of any reason why anyone would consider this to be a feature. Stefan