From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags name collision. Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:46:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7.ref@Ergus> <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7@Ergus> <83pmln69n0.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411134749.ps6g5ulpbamzm6ot@Ergus> <83k0bv679q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8646"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 11 19:07:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ndxW4-000204-B0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:07:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36846 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndxW3-0004rx-Cl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:07:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndxB7-0003eB-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:36254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndxB5-0002R6-3X; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:46:12 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A469E80306; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:46:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C200680310; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:46:06 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1649695566; bh=MWhT81jqs7iZOIHLUbQ6hev6USrpY1TnG4oU/5px77I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=pfTSkgyt2xKHSLaK4NfEZoJ/DZZZb+R5SKJ09CzuOrLKI87ozLFcQ2b1bm+1Sq1I0 ridylUUkqq0YxTJTLhSiHw4rGCoRVok0vYIICSasJL9EWaOccmcP8LVLCm3uiWIFC+ k2aiT49CE7SsdE8ZQ6vFBD6i6bSnHm/01+c4G8iprforwDg4Fj5QbxYajs+9SNKj90 geEUw4X9R7ewjixR6M6jwv1sF2foSVT2BfzickVOSL9GsvA0Sa1Y13Uqf6K+kG2vcd z127n+wBSaJPy5OuC4crKvWlW7Cx5eRjL5MJh6zjZpvnwDLB0uejgDmX0qIrihEQw8 risBRzu+zPDuA== Original-Received: from alfajor (modemcable240.145-162-184.mc.videotron.ca [184.162.145.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDBCD1202BD; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:46:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83k0bv679q.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:09:53 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288230 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii [2022-04-11 17:09:53] wrote: > I'm opposed to dropping stuff just because we can. If you want to add > an option not to install ctags if another version is installed > (similarly to what we do with movemail), that's fine. But please > don't argue for dropping parts of Emacs unconditionally because you > personally find it not useful, that argument will never fly with me. Maybe we should install it under a different name, to avoid the conflict but without losing the functionality? Stefan