From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 6fd4ab250b: Revert "Improve X event timestamp tracking" Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 03:46:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <165984407752.16927.13675044548281916019@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220807034757.EE76BC09BFD@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23733"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 07 09:48:28 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oKb1Q-00061G-IX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 09:48:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53094 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oKb1P-0002nX-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 03:48:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oKazo-000256-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 03:46:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:10131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oKazl-0007e5-SM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 03:46:47 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 901B6100171; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 03:46:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 64FF310010C; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 03:46:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1659858402; bh=/Z9ixFaCag7/o3e8JaWmOF3C1AITi2hzXrzT9beY2MU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=RB+61dbuGisCDP5widYhxfowlunMuFU6dG9dxLW9ma/xnKxyhStDsDxE2XYIOhoIh lITlZd80J2w0x6Hzg7YxNbkOpcOtrmHgEKlnF5wsf1KWc3RHf0VphhA+PFLUXNUNqd AxoTnDJPLZr3WQgwXc6n9aWAjc57Wc3qffr5uefweXLPfyMk/vESHzHm2mTdiPkN2m ThgvJ8d5uf460rAj/IDFECfjMLs17vd9Pu5q5sljPnvzDdTzhQIwbEI17C5klPW+h9 SG8zuTJJJ24NtdI0FsVzrumA6MANU7lq5ESbxubNvbMvg/kqQnJjG8uXWASapL5l37 x4Jd+9btYmQog== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [46.44.221.102]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4DAD120315; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 03:46:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20220807034757.EE76BC09BFD@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> (Po Lu via Mailing list for Emacs changes's message of "Sat, 6 Aug 2022 23:47:57 -0400 (EDT)") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293185 Archived-At: Po Lu via Mailing list for Emacs changes [2022-08-06 23:47:57] wrote: > Revert "Improve X event timestamp tracking" > > This reverts commit 4b98a79a508ebdc719abfcf51ee6de32e46d0e1c. > > This change was installed without answering several important > questions. In order to keep the discussion heat down, it's best not to rush new changes, nor to revert them. AFAIK there was no urgency here to revert the change since it doesn't completely break normal use. Stefan