From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `inhibit-mark-movement' Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:22:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200412080256.30114.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <871xe1trnq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200412081740.48280.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <871xe0y8lg.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1102533813 22571 80.91.229.6 (8 Dec 2004 19:23:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Paul Pogonyshev Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 08 20:23:28 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cc7PL-0000dI-00 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 20:23:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc7ZC-0001lc-Gp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:33:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc7Yr-0001jU-Pm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:33:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc7Yq-0001is-LX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:33:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc7Yq-0001ip-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:33:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cc7Ov-0008Bi-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244A58282A5; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:23:01 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427DA4AC660; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:22:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 321B88CA69; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:22:56 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Juri Linkov In-Reply-To: <871xe0y8lg.fsf@jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:59:23 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-4.368, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.53, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30879 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30879 > Just a few days ago I looked at mark activation commands, and fixed > them (`mark-word', `mark-sexp', `mark-paragraph', `mark-defun') to > support transient-mark-mode. The patch is below. It could be > installed as well. I wouldn't call that "fix", rather "change". It's not like the current behavior is clearly broken and your suggested new one is The Right Way. Maybe your new behavior is overall preferable, I don't know, but I do know that it would surprise me (I use transient-mark-mode and M-C-SPC pretty heavily). Stefan