unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Lisp indentation.
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:43:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvfyz3p9vh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mztbmk6r.fsf@xs4all.nl> (Lute Kamstra's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:26:20 +0100")

> In about 25% of the cases the lisp-indent-hook property is used to
> specify the desired indentation and in the remaining 75% of the cases,
> the lisp-indent-function property is used.  Is the second preferred?
> (The docsting of the function lisp-indent-function suggest this.)
> Should occurrences of lisp-indent-hook be renamed to
> lisp-indent-function?

Yes, although there is no urgency.

> In most cases the indentation property is put on the symbol at the
> place the symbol is defined.  Symbols that are defined in C get their
> indentation property in lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mode.el.  There are
> however a few symbols that are defined in lisp elsewhere that get
> their lisp-indent-function property set in lisp-mode.el.  For example
> save-selected-window, save-match-data, and with-current-buffer.  Is
> there some policy wrt the place where the indentation property should
> be set?

I'd say they should be set in the `declare' part of the definition of
the macro.  See the definition of `when' or `unless' for examples.
Unless it's common to edit code that uses the macro while the macro itself
is not loaded, in which case it might be worthwhile to put the `put' in some
other file like lisp-mode.el.


        Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-10 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-10 18:26 Lisp indentation Lute Kamstra
2005-03-10 19:43 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2005-03-11  1:29   ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-12 17:40     ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-13 13:23   ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-13 13:51     ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-13 16:29       ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-14 12:58         ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-14 13:55           ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-14  3:00     ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jwvfyz3p9vh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
    --to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).