From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TODO item: obsolete bug-reporting commands Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:47:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87y7962obp.fsf@rabkins.net> <87fxv1zfab.fsf@rabkins.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205009334 23554 80.91.229.12 (8 Mar 2008 20:48:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 20:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yoni Rabkin Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 08 21:49:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JY5yj-0000Y0-Nf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:49:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JY5yB-0008I9-RO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:48:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JY5xV-0007kI-Kf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:47:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JY5xT-0007iq-Rw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:47:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JY5xT-0007ic-JX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:47:55 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JY5xT-0002Je-Bt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:47:55 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArcCAPKJ0kfO+J2CdGdsb2JhbACQfQEwmSKBBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,468,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="15746676" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2008 15:47:54 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.157.130]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id OXD60054; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:47:54 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3F9907F60; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:47:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87fxv1zfab.fsf@rabkins.net> (Yoni Rabkin's message of "Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:22:20 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91773 Archived-At: >> Indeed, we may want to revisit this in the future, but in any case, it's >> useful to redirect report to the normal Emacs address if the claimed >> maintainer is not the maintainer any more: for those problems, we don't >> have any reason to wait. > Should I send out emails to the package maintainers in question and ask > them? I'm asking because I wound not send such email on behalf of the > Emacs developers without the explicit permission of this list. Yes, please do. > Based on the answers (or lack thereof), I could then prepare a patch-set > which changes the appropriate addresses in their corresponding packages. That would be great, For those who don't respond, you may want to add a note about "didn't respond when contacted " at the beginning of the file, next to the maintainer's name. Stefan