From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On minibuffer completion (Cygwin) Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:23:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4894D0A5.7030105@alice.it> <87myjuomzc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217787833 22450 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2008 18:23:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , angelo.graziosi@alice.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Joe Buehler Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 03 20:24:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KPiG1-00055n-D8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:24:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47943 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KPiF5-00054S-4F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:23:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPiEz-0004zV-El for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPiEx-0004uu-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:23:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58134 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KPiEx-0004uh-DE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:36141) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KPiEr-0002K1-77; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:23:29 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-21.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.21]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m73INk7B017288; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:23:47 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 079A4B404F; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:23:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 03 Aug 2008 06:23:20 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3073=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102006 Archived-At: > My opinion is that Cygwin runs on a case-insensitive filesystem, and > therefore should behave accordingly. Users who don't like that can > always customize Emacs. But if the Cygwin system itself (i.e. the Cygwin utilities) tries to pretend that it runs on a case-sensitive filesystem, then Emacs should follow that convention. Where's the maintainer of the Cygwin port? Stefan