From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add cedet/ede/shell.el to ELCFILES Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:31:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83vdiegtcd.fsf@gnu.org> <200910180601.n9I61TRh002856@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255876411 4064 80.91.229.12 (18 Oct 2009 14:33:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 18 16:33:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MzWoy-00078a-DU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:33:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39163 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MzWox-0003By-KF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:33:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MzWnN-0002ix-ES for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:31:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MzWnH-0002ht-Ix for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:31:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48612 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MzWnH-0002hq-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:31:35 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:61857 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MzWnE-00008d-It; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:31:32 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsYEAL7D2krO+IKD/2dsb2JhbACBUtU8hDEEiAWCeQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,581,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="47760435" Original-Received: from 206-248-130-131.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.130.131]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2009 10:31:28 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E1A5C7FD5; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:31:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200910180601.n9I61TRh002856@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:01:29 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116224 Archived-At: >> BTW, if someone can come up with a way to get rid of `elcfiles' in >> lisp/Makefile.in that would be very welcome. Its only purpose is to >> allow parallel compilation of the .el files (which happens to be >> unreliable anyway), so the pain it brings is fairly high compared to the >> benefit. A solution that doesn't requires something like >> `update-elcfiles' would be much preferred. > Wouldn't the parallel compilation problem go away if your idea of using > the .el files (rather than .elc) during compilation would be implemented? That would fix the "(which happens to be unreliable anyway)", but is unrelated to the main point of my argument: the update-elcfiles and related mess. Stefan