From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: redisplay system of emacs Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:04:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <27349166.post@talk.nabble.com> <83bpge50k5.fsf@gnu.org> <87vdem8gly.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87k4v1xm4l.fsf@gmail.com> <83sk9prvnd.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4v1vz5f.fsf@gmail.com> <83eil8sn5b.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264874657 27953 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2010 18:04:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: paul.r.ml@gmail.com, Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 30 19:04:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbHg3-0003mX-2l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:04:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51981 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbHg2-00014V-Ic for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:04:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NbHfy-00014Q-Fe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53640 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbHfy-00014D-5x for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbHfw-00014q-V4 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:04:05 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:12103 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbHfw-00014g-P1; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:04:04 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcFAF8DZEtFpaN9/2dsb2JhbACBM9d0hEUEilo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,375,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="54984157" Original-Received: from 69-165-163-125.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.163.125]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2010 13:04:03 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4ECBBB44C7; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:04:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83eil8sn5b.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:53:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120711 Archived-At: >> So, yes, it's probably fairly easy to do an Emacs-like editor using >> another extension language etc... > I thought the issue was not creation of a new editor, but using in > Emacs code written elsewhere for some tasks Emacs now does with code > written specifically for it. Given that there's no other Elisp implementation that I know of, if you want to use one of the existing language implementations to replace Emacs's own code... Stefan