From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What have the Romans done for us? (Bazaar) Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:52:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20100405145637.GA3248@muc.de> <83zl1hyku5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270497166 7623 80.91.229.12 (5 Apr 2010 19:52:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 05 21:52:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NysLj-0001eG-Kw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:52:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46226 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NysLi-0004Yw-M0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:52:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NysLV-0004Ut-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:52:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47564 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NysLT-0004UP-Vi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:52:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NysLS-0004Y0-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:52:27 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:60952 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NysLR-0004Xk-39; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:52:25 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABLcuUvO+K6K/2dsb2JhbACbS3K3JIUHBIsq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,366,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="60248086" Original-Received: from 206-248-174-138.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.174.138]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2010 15:52:24 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 09C27660BF; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:52:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:43:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123222 Archived-At: >> "bzr revision-info cyd@stupidchicken.com-20090730011415-1ur84cd4r2dats1v" >> indeed does not find such a revision neither on the trunk nor on the >> emacs-23 branch. What is that revision, and why did it disappear? > It only exists on the EMACS_32_1_RC branch. I guess we should turn those important tags into branches to make it easier to refer to them. >> Does it mean our repository is corrupted? > There is no way to clone a bzr repository as a whole. We may want to post a bug report about it to Bzr anyway: I think Bzr should either be able to (tell you to) fetch the necessary revisions, or should try and prevent the situation from occurring (either by automatically including the revisions referred from tags or by only allowing tags that refer to revisions included in the branch). Stefan