From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:06:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355007982 18239 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2012 23:06:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 23:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 09 00:06:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThTTd-0003aI-8C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 00:06:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45560 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThTTQ-0005WD-Rw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:06:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThTTP-0005W8-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:06:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThTTO-0002Nc-92 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:06:19 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:8450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThTTM-0002NM-Mh; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:06:16 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09soXOY/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNEAETiBwFugmQRAOIQppxgViDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="209432848" Original-Received: from 108-161-115-152.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.161.115.152]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Dec 2012 18:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D5C6058D3B; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 18:06:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Sat, 8 Dec 2012 09:43:22 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155385 Archived-At: > Sorry. The processor is an Intel Core i5-2410M @ 2.30GHz. I get about 6min with "make -j2 bootstrap" on a Thinkpad T61, which is an older machine (T9300 core 2 duo at 2.5GHz), so 30min sounds very slow, even for sequential compilation. IIRC the Windows bootstrap code is not as well tuned, and byte-compiles all the .el files with the "bootstrap-emacs" instead of only compiling the preloaded files this way. That might explain it (the "bootstrap-emacs" is an emacs binary built with the non-compiled Elisp files, so its Elisp functions are slower). Stefan