From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Diff emails to debbugs? Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:06:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ip7m5qgp.fsf@gnus.org> <8gtxr6f0em.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356764800 5558 80.91.229.3 (29 Dec 2012 07:06:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 29 08:06:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ToqVS-0001rl-V2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:06:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45369 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ToqVD-0006nq-LZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:06:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ToqVA-0006ni-1X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:06:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ToqV9-0007Q5-7U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:06:35 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:36324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ToqV4-0007Pp-H8; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:06:30 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBT76P3r004114; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:06:26 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1193FAE038; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:06:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8gtxr6f0em.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:21:21 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4445=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4445> : streams <882737> : uri <1306272> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155978 Archived-At: >> So perhaps it would be nice if it Cc'd the debbugs address, so the bug >> submitter could easily see what the resulting diff is? > Or even if it could close the bug. Closing the bug wouldn't be a good idea: I regularly install patches which fix part of a bug but not all of it. Stefan