From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Requesting review before pushing patch to ELPA Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:14:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423062888 2483 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2015 15:14:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Jackson Hamilton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 04 16:14:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ1f7-0006UV-Rw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:14:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ1f7-0006kT-By for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:14:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35099) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ1f3-0006kO-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:14:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ1f1-0000rp-2L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:14:37 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:38823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ1f0-0000r5-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:14:35 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t14FEXQJ010961; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:14:34 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DB5791758; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:14:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Jackson Hamilton's message of "Wed, 4 Feb 2015 01:32:53 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5207=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5207> : inlines <2030> : streams <1384660> : uri <1846245> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182373 Archived-At: > There are a whole bunch of people who claim copyright on those files; their > names are listed in the files' headers. I'll note that when I requested > copyright assignment, I alerted the clerk that I was using these libraries. > The plugin doesn't work without them. Does context-coloring not work at all without those files, or does it work just fine for some modes but not for others (presumably not for javascript mode)? > I could probably externalize those files into an "npm" package and instruct > users to install a separate executable to run the JavaScript portion of the > plugin. But I'd much rather just include them in the package, because then > it "works out-of-the-box". Can you give me some background about where those files come from? Have they been written specifically for context-coloring or are they taken from some other project? > As for ert-async, what would be our course of action if he does not agree? While it's of course possible, it seems highly unlikely, so I wouldn't worry about it until that happens. Stefan