From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: Using CEDET modules from Emacs core Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:45:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k29d7zvw.fsf@engster.org> <87fuk08i01.fsf@engster.org> <87d1f36xnc.fsf@engster.org> <5fbb38e9-9f95-823c-7042-afc9cfa1d863@siege-engine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487115971 21589 195.159.176.226 (14 Feb 2017 23:46:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:46:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Eric Ludlam Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 00:46:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdmnN-0005FN-GC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:46:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37761 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdmnT-0008Dj-4Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:46:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdmnK-0008DN-AA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdmnH-0003Vn-1n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:42338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdmnG-0003Us-Qd; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:45:58 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AbCQBXlqNY//7rSC1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1JBhDSFVoVykS4ZAZJ9hBsahgIEAgKCAUQUAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEagZWIxALNBIUGA0kLolQsX2LYwEBCAIBJYs7ijkBBJBBizGTdwGITIZVkxU2IYEAIBQIKoceIoo8AQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0AbCQBXlqNY//7rSC1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1JBhDSFVoVykS4ZAZJ9hBsahgIEAgKCAUQUAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEagZWIxALNBIUGA0kLolQsX2LYwEBCAIBJYs7ijkBBJBBizGTdwGITIZVkxU2IYEAIBQIKoceIoo8AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,163,1484024400"; d="scan'208";a="292900700" Original-Received: from 45-72-235-254.cpe.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([45.72.235.254]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 14 Feb 2017 18:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9DA2BAEF9B; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:45:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <5fbb38e9-9f95-823c-7042-afc9cfa1d863@siege-engine.com> (Eric Ludlam's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:51:34 -0500") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212390 gmane.emacs.orgmode:112136 Archived-At: >> "Semantic is too slow for C++" complaint (e.g. compared to Clang-based >> background process solutions) is unlikely to go away. > While I haven't had time to work on CEDET lately, I'd be happy to discuss > specific performance issues and share ideas on how to improve them, > presumably after the most recent merge is completed. Isn't it the case that CEDET could also make use of a Clang backend? Stefan