From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Print representation of records and hash tables Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:21:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513092138 28880 195.159.176.226 (12 Dec 2017 15:22:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:22:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 12 16:22:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmNo-0007DZ-VR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:22:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58974 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmNw-0002n2-65 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:22:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmNk-0002ew-9C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:22:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmNh-0004wy-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:22:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=53616 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmNh-0004w3-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:22:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOmNX-0006YW-C8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:21:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:IMvzne2tOH/9xr8wphltYUxfXiQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220927 Archived-At: > Yes, it's confusing, and I'm very much against it. Interpretation of ELisp > code (even compiled code) now changes in a very subtle manner depending on > whether a record named `hash-table` happens to be defined or not. Similarly, interpretation of Elisp code can change in a very subtle manner if someone does (fset 'apply (lambda ...)). Stefan