From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Use of minibuffer-prompt face when minibuffer is not involved Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 18:36:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8736lmi2dg.fsf@gmail.com> <54cf21f3-86fa-4af4-9872-7493b44e2f6f@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="34377"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 11 00:37:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hPE8b-0008ms-Op for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 00:37:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPE8a-0006tp-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 18:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPE80-0006tk-MA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 18:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPE7z-0003Fk-PS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 18:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:65398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPE7z-0003Fc-JY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 18:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8886944219D; Fri, 10 May 2019 18:36:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail02.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 890B344217C; Fri, 10 May 2019 18:36:29 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1557527789; bh=QRbu8thVUg72AoAi1a3p54J0bqKjetQGJz9VEuT8GVQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z8w6GulnM6dtbd4QXypawIQBj3Ej3uAcOLmCoiOgch+pX2QVlhOMYtAqBy7uUz1Yw 58g1panFf+DNtZvVwFJsymyYLxaFZ4GlHbl5Ke6N2UJRA/L4E6U2SreRwokpPjkNCj pHUXmeFG5RQL4cunSRV9U80Q0zYkj+bdBllES6YVYzCHB0XzPZU68EX9bMY5lEq014 9e4LlaO1WL4B+Jk0PrfrnPoY87Z3laz1S7OmsDignquWSQsiPAJKDP9l6U97e7CSaz GOKD1mmqRmZnyweGEaAyFuHGGamldUMTckC8mbYh1f9C5mjd/ZLZ+Itq0sW5UfySb6 48NvPbRrHYopA== Original-Received: from pastel (69-196-155-191.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.155.191]) by mail02.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61C98120E5B; Fri, 10 May 2019 18:36:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <54cf21f3-86fa-4af4-9872-7493b44e2f6f@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 10 May 2019 14:59:44 -0700 (PDT)") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236399 Archived-At: > The question raised for emacs-devel by this thread > is whether non-minbuffer prompting should have a > face, and if so, which face. My answer was to this question. Let me repeat it to make it clear: the difference between minibuffer prompts and non-minibuffer prompts should be a purely internal one. Stefan