From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VOTE: Changing completions-common-part face's default Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:17:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87h83ipoi0.fsf@gmail.com> <93235eb5-8e04-7182-e2a4-49fbe610ee2b@yandex.ru> <28d4ae09-daca-324b-2fa6-9d7138d710fa@yandex.ru> <834kzeb1cc.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgmxa6dh.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9rt82tt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="183171"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 09 17:18:38 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTRd-000lYL-Sr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 17:18:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37560 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTRc-0003eR-NU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:18:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51699) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTQN-0003c6-8L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:17:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTQM-0006SA-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:17:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:54552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTQK-0006RZ-Or; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:17:16 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 958CB449A5D; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:17:15 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5F5B54497FB; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:17:14 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1573316234; bh=57Q6yVa2jzIVeFVBrElabsTWYbC94q7oFb3LlQVHH0Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VLbnGmrCAXWEyiPgsN/x7HjcIrdN9dJoHq7E3NcoN4hpZmtrgentMjK7AZbjX5lRc d+tw0zjASRq4nySeFgN5cEVUsoXpozj865gxZ9MYWH13VMbcsjUGuZxagrOdyHxGsD EPRNDUPgMmcn02yMGN1gMWhD+94YrQsr+uwePJtTJccJ89xRoquisrvi6VDigGD8Sd 7TT6rr2Dl1WLimKKd+jk0AF14lDbgy04rCjZUm4DcRm/qM0n5gj3mBxu8fYF68pcWd RdEilEUb7fno2ok+qF6/XSKjtH61Z1hK8wmiWen/tcuQhe1RZ6m/x2uUkoatZZwpv2 EhRYCqdaFNBBQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.47.134]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 260BC120F87; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:17:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83v9rt82tt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2019 17:52:14 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242047 Archived-At: >> While highlighting the "common-part" is definitely standard, there's >> definitely not a standard *way* to highlight it. While a background >> color is used in some cases I have the vague impression that it might be >> a minority rather than a majority of cases. > Don't "the other" applications use bold instead of color? It seems many do, but not all. Not sure about what is more common in this respect within the context of text editors. >> >> we'd also want to find a color for the dark background case, >> > Right. >> But I'd also rather postpone this decision to later. > Not sure why: a lot of people use dark background in Emacs, AFAIK. Just because I prefer to do it one step at a time (I have the impression(delusion?) it can help keep the discussion more focused). I do hope the second step of choosing a color for the dark-background case will come before Emacs-27, tho. Stefan