From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: font-lock-fontify-block (was: 'M-o' ('facemap-keymap') has now been removed until March 10th 2021) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:12:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29515"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 11 18:22:52 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKP1P-0007bm-Hs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:22:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43508 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKP1O-0001J2-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:22:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKOro-0000iu-BM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:12:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:56707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKOrk-0006NQ-3y; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:12:54 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 44BB110023D; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:12:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A14D01001D2; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:12:48 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1615482768; bh=77Ta842gB5PJM2U+aQyrjBd4fM/q3/D8YNFDXAcS2T0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=J2fBbJxQjcLLsQ6ETJ5nSf3oh/36GkEEHQhaZevm8G+x1LeGWX3BMTFVBed7pBTsR yXgI6a9vRvy7nXLtIxrqzuEE7VIRcyZCtcjNl3l58/dsxpLvr+Z+6eiXZ4GVtDjKnD GJoy3+vNcgs0BzB2uH5M9ZHLcDKRScafb5i9ml2vJr1RWDae4Jqg98jajbCybgeQ6I V7nmvs1cFWNvvI83xi4L4pbaM7qo5eM9wzDOlWAb+n/mjOMD902N/wkC6rzPbsNssp JlOF8EQ88RH4LGtNIeAjkJXOu641Nt0gzzIu92dArtXoIRzMU5hJrxdI/2fXkAI/pY E1QD5umCMvJew== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.43.249]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DCBF1201BB; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:12:48 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:53:10 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266338 Archived-At: >> There hasn't been much feedback during the one month test period. I >> think there's been one complaint about missing `center-line', and >> there's been at least two people mentioning `font-lock-fontify-block' >> (previously bound to `M-o M-o'). I don't recall anybody complaining >> about `facemenu-keymap' itself, though, or `center-paragraph'. > > IMO, font-lock-fontify-block should have a keybinding. IME, it's too > important to be left without one. Wow, I didn't expect that. I was instead about to ask for details about the mentions of `font-lock-fontify-block' since I view it as a command which "should" be a no-op (barring bugs, obviously). I'd be quite interested to know more about those existing use cases (they may point to other misgivings of mine, as well). Stefan