From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 'M-o' ('facemap-keymap') has now been removed until March 10th 2021 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:14:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <32A55BBD-1A3F-4EC4-817F-7C3408C22A65@bydasein.com> <22aaf0faddac64397c7d@heytings.org> <4B2A00EB-8C04-4B9D-BA86-692D67207AFD@bydasein.com> <22aaf0faddc2bf87fd3a@heytings.org> <0009872A-AD9D-4B08-B714-BFEDDAAF9125@bydasein.com> <8786a8e8faf45a989904@heytings.org> <8786a8e8faa6f278b198@heytings.org> <340C1C00-D6DE-46AF-99ED-ED349E8F8D4F@bydasein.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20511"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Gregory Heytings , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Paul W. Rankin" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 24 16:16:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lP5FE-00055X-AO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:16:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43960 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP5FD-0003Yp-8w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:16:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP5Dx-00030f-Ne for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:17778) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP5Dt-0007wM-9f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 591A410022F; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:15:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7D75810006B; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:15:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1616598901; bh=cUmZIuTxLae1DC0QGeH/XTmVjXZAbQOQrpq9yXxNQCc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=QJ28AHD5o12msTlZSGItIvkW/zF5n6x24N+iX+P6nnmFHm8HQjPm5Osmt0xkbaclY IKUE9EBIJIJQ2TsOHfTG2zl+TLeTeFsr3P/qYfbcIM7xZtLCF0OQbn6FyTXVKDvX1G 1Xag/eqmpxSUA+zPsIF/ADk0whhEBg6cg3OL5Cw58yh1uuYJ6nQRpKKvBuU4x0iOhj aLsWfJnK5Rijj6NGlRAa+Rf3XlHGE7pO6u7+UNvsRmLTJmKA3GZbIqusZCoqnvfPaz nMKxvz2odvWio5zMs46cW6dV8NRF/9NcoRi+kYKijmt/HpoqPnc4HbdQfnwrT+qXue cCmQqY02ogZbA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.43.249]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 500381203FF; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:15:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <340C1C00-D6DE-46AF-99ED-ED349E8F8D4F@bydasein.com> (Paul W. Rankin's message of "Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:30:20 +1000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266958 Archived-At: > It seems that `font-lock-mode' eventually calls `font-lock-default-function' > which calls `font-lock-mode-internal' which sets > `font-lock-fontify-buffer-function' to `jit-lock-refontify' (in > e.g. emacs-lisp-mode) which would explain what we're seeing? These are internal implementation details, which depend also on things like `font-lock-support-mode`. I was just pointing out that your understanding of the interaction between font-lock and the `fontified` property is not right. And that's a problem in this discussion because the "expected" behavior of `font-lock-fontify-block` and `font-lock-fontify-buffer` (and sadly, to a lesser extent also `font-lock-update`) is by and large accidentally defined by the implementation rather than by any human-level description. Stefan