From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:05:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tuhmgiew.fsf@posteo.net> <87pmsaghed.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12168"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , "Nicolas P. Rougier (inria)" , emacs-devel To: Adam Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 19 01:06:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mcbia-0002vX-HD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 01:06:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60584 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcbiY-0000fT-VU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcbhR-0008Jt-Gl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:05:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:45909) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcbhO-00040K-Mk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D8D78100264; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:05:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7278110001F; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:05:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1634598338; bh=o2ryYNHcxQBItOsToBYQgFA/RmhX+1kLxTJZCNrfr+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=W0nNse1h3wpM9S2b630FtB1tKjHzXEAi/tqRW2GZPj4uf/Navjm+RD+i7lUKiwmLJ 2/rPtNieRLYipw+dwlh63XBJVgPJoN4co41shHpN2bA8LGwgTB6l9mZ3uWEaZuGfi1 Ebf+m4ew9cdPlCtfxL+j8PCoojjB3budV29cbl84CKyCcJB+kYXYsHNwI4p9c7kfGr sbiH2M6p5otZxZz3IzRA9smfBSg9UIXaASaN+fRGhk02Y//3YOyK2QD6qjcXMqLv4s 2LQ/OiayABnlTkP4itaN1Cg77zpgL/sb1645gzZyq+5RTM82aBOtAuK6g8WonH4CG3 uXZQ33ZjpBDHQ== Original-Received: from ceviche (unknown [45.72.241.23]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 440C61201C3; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:05:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Adam Porter's message of "Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:50:32 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277330 Archived-At: > Yes, I'd be glad to have ts.el in GNU ELPA. That'd be nice. > And I'd be glad to remove the dependency on s.el to facilitate that. Yes, that'd be necessary before we can add it to GNU ELPA. > The only potential issue that I can see is that it currently emits > extra warnings at load time (or is it compile time? I forget...) on > Emacs 28 due to more strict checking in the byte compiler. That's fine (code doesn't have to be bug-free, luckily, otherwise not only GNU ELPA would be empty, but Emacs wouldn't exist either). >> What might be an issue is if the "ts-" namespace is considered to be >> "too valuable", as was the issue with "s-" and "f-". The maintainers >> would have to decide on that, I can only speculate. two-letter (well, 3 if you count the dash) prefixes are fine, thanks (we have loads of them). Stefan