From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] EUDC email addresses via completion-at-point in message-mode Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:17:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87o814wi9l.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87ee1z4xzq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87bkx3wv7w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87ee1yz4sj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34961"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 15 19:19:48 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nfPbn-0008tl-Ih for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 19:19:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45808 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nfPbm-00051U-FF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nfPa9-0003xR-4t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:24122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nfPa0-0005Zi-Lo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:17:58 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0CBE7441858; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:17:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0EDB1441856; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:17:53 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1650043073; bh=O47/JfjIizRf4W/YMZC5PXdisMWmAgS4gZ+ejc9LNtA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=WxORELLkH51lg1xCQymD2uI5pNryovAtq5QHXikZQ8MwHG11kvunE6u7Wot1hXEOE WHJf5fhnaBoiIGyIcjiPPzQMbUzSqqbRRM+S4wABzJEVKGfDktyylm6MsoZwf5lufd EFTMlBAFGXm5/qiCT0kfzknjrnQh3qC6oPKqhpQEq47Xaw+0L8CkgVuSTqaNo/U4oz tI9Oh0TqpqldI5xnaVl4mnCmFsalDR5PIe39Z5KRagVMwaTlJWbWdvFSACeN+rA2g5 9mcWRwTYYY319XZ25/KJA9PBvFhWQMZXHLlHjliEEVjwJGAuzlwNfPDWzmciP/yzEn wj3wfnHKt2dJQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDDB81200BF; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:17:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ee1yz4sj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Fri, 15 Apr 2022 09:31:56 -0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288456 Archived-At: > What I meant was that I don't see any way of inserting EBDB completion > results into an arbitrary list of other results coming from other user > configuration. If we set `message-expand-name-standard-ui' non-nil then > we get to use the `message--name-table' function, but that function only > consults BBDB, EUDC, and ecomplete. Indeed, that's the function that needs to be improved so it takes a list of "provider functions" and merges the results. > I guess I was expecting some sort of setup that uses > `completion-table-merge' on an option holding a bunch of functions. I'd > just provide a EBDB function to be added to that option, and we're done. Sounds about right. Stefan